|

The Historic Cost of Capital
by Humphrey Nash
The historic cost of capital is the interest rate used to discount the
expected cash flows within the AFTF accounting model. It
emerges from the dual validation procedure. The discount
rate is vital to determining the present values. If the historic
cost of capital is not appropriate then the AFTF model is called into
question. Let's examine some of the characteristics of the
historic cost of capital.
Necessary. If we are dealing with expected cash flows and
want to know the shareholder value present in those cash flows we must
discount those cash flows to produce a present value. A discount
rate must be chosen or determined.
Unequivocal. For any particular cash flow model the dual
validation determines a unique historic cost of capital.
Easy. The determination of the historic cost of capital is
relatively easy, once the expected cash flows are modeled.
Auditable. The historic cost of capital is auditable.
Coordinated. The historic cost of capital is coordinated
with the cash flows model. This is desirable since the
historic cost of capital applies to cash flows.
Motivated. The historic cost of capital is designed to
express values using the capital market's scale.
Stable. The historic cost of capital is reasonably stable.
Since the five-year capital market validation is based on moving
five-year procedure it only changes by one fifth of the difference
between the new year added and the old year dropped off.
Current. The historic cost of capital is reasonably
current. It is a five-year trailing development updated each
year.
Balanced. The five-year base period for the historic cost
of capital is a reasonable compromise between stability and currency.
This compromise permits the capital markets to communicate the cost of
capital while also permitting management to convey its cash flow
expectations. Relevant financial reporting emerges from this dialogue.
Disclosed. The historic cost of capital is prominently disclosed
in the Statement of Values. The effects of any change in the historic
cost of capital are detailed in the Effect of Assumption Changes,
Exhibit.2
Comparable. The historic cost of capital itself can be
meaningfully compared from one year to the next or among companies.
Among other things, a lower cost of capital reflects investor confidence
in management. More importantly the use of the historic cost of capital
makes valuations comparable from year to year and among all companies.
The historic cost of capital scales all value measurements to the
capital market value scale.
Superior method. The dual validation method is superior to other
methods for determining the cost of capital. It is easy and objective.
It accomplishes the goal of expressing value in capital market terms.
Others methods may not achieve this goal, except by coincidence.
Others
methods may not be coordinated with expected cash flows. They may fail
simple logical scrutiny. For example, the CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing
Model) derives a cost of capital that is independent of price level of
capital! Other methods may not permit the dialogue between management
and the capital markets needed to establish company value.
Decision useful. Discounting company expected cash flows using
the historic cost of capital produces a company valuation that is useful
for the shareholder's capital allocation decisions. This results from
the use of a shareholder (capital market) cost of capital. This same
rate of discount is appropriate for use for company internal capital
allocation decisions, because management represents the shareholder and
must adopt the shareholder's perspective. The historic cost of capital,
as a discount rate, is also useful in pricing decisions, profit studies,
managerial performance measurement, etc.
Measures Progress. The historic cost of capital is not only used
as a discount rate for future cash flows, it is the accumulation rate
used to bring the prior period end valuation forward to the current
time. Hence value added is defined as the current company value less the
prior company value accumulated at the historic cost of capital.
Consistent application. The historic cost of capital is used for
decisions at all levels. Everybody within an organization will be on the
same wavelength -- the shareholder's. This facilitates decisions and
analysis. For example, separate results can be easily combined.
Manager's will know whether or not their decisions meet the cost of
capital. They will become sensitized to adding value.
They will become
sensitized to the future.
Disciplines. The historic cost of capital disciplines values.
For
example, if expected cash flows are exaggerated then the historic cost
of capital will increase so that the discounted cash flows are not
exaggerated. This discipline makes the accounting reliable.
Inclusive. The market cost of capital includes all components
needed to discount the future and no more. It implicitly contains
provisions for inflation, a real risk free rate of return, risk of loss
of principal, risk of variance in the return (including volatility of
share price) and other contingencies not properly factored in to the
expected cash flows. Who says? The capital market says.
There is no
doubling up of discounts since the the historic cost of capital is
coordinated with the expected cash flows.
Selectivity. The historic cost of capital "normalizes"
old information (already processed by the capital markets) expressing it
in capital market terms, but it allows new information to pass through
unaltered so that value added or value lost is clear.
Accepted. The historic cost of capital is an example of what is
called the "intrinsic rate" by accountants. The dual
validation is a well defined procedure for determining an intrinsic rate
within a disciplined prospective accounting model.
The historic cost of capital serves as a general purpose discount rate.
It is easily determined and unequivocal. It makes prospective accounting
relevant and reliable. It does the job right and it does the right job.
1 A short base period would preclude management from
adequately communicating its expectations. In the extreme, a current
year cost of capital would produce a company valuation exactly matching
the market valuation. While this is perfectly scaled to the market value
it obviously doesn't permit management to communicate to the market.
Comparability between years would suffer.
A long base period would preclude the capital markets from communicating
its yield expectations. In the extreme, a fifty year base period would
be immune to the current cost of capital. Management's expectations
would be clear and comparability would be enhanced but the valuation
would not be scaled to current market values.
2 Although the effect of the change in the cost of capital is
detailed, it (the effect) should not necessarily be excluded.
It may seem peculiar
that capital market can add to or subtract from company value, but such
externalities are important and legitimate determinants of company
value. So, for example, inflation or higher costs of capital have real
effects on present values and on market values. A relevant company
valuation must incorporate all factors which affect value, including a
changing cost of capital. |